🏠 Home
AQA A-Level Economics · Theme 4

Exchange
Rates

Fixed vs floating, supply and demand, depreciation effects, Marshall-Lerner, J-curve

📘 12 slides + 8 questions ⏱ 25 min 🎯 Theme 4: Global Perspective
Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson you will be able to…

Explain how floating exchange rates are determined by supply and demand, and list factors causing currency movements
Distinguish fixed, floating and managed float exchange rate systems and evaluate their advantages and disadvantages
Analyse the effects of depreciation and appreciation on trade, inflation and economic growth
Explain the Marshall-Lerner condition and the J-curve effect — why depreciation may worsen the trade balance short-term
Foundations

What is an Exchange Rate?

Exchange Rate
The price of one currency expressed in terms of another. E.g. £1 = $1.27. If the rate rises to £1 = $1.40, the pound has appreciated — it buys more dollars. If it falls to £1 = $1.15, the pound has depreciated.
TERMINOLOGY
Appreciation: currency increases in value (floated up by market). Depreciation: currency falls in value (market-driven). Revaluation: deliberate increase under fixed system. Devaluation: deliberate decrease under fixed system.
EFFECTIVE EXCHANGE RATE
A trade-weighted basket of currencies — the average value of a currency against all trading partners, weighted by trade volumes. Sterling Effective Exchange Rate Index (ERI): sterling fell ~15% after the Brexit vote (June 2016). More useful than bilateral rates for assessing competitiveness.
REAL VS NOMINAL
Nominal exchange rate: the actual market rate. Real exchange rate: adjusts for inflation differentials. Real ER = Nominal ER × (Domestic price level / Foreign price level). Competitiveness depends on the real rate — if UK inflation is 5% and US 2%, sterling's real value rises even if nominal rate is unchanged.
Floating Rate Determination

Demand and Supply of Sterling

DEMAND FOR £
Foreign buyers need £ to: buy UK exports (goods, services, tourism); invest in UK assets (gilts, equities, property); speculate on sterling rising. Demand curve downward-sloping: lower £ makes UK goods/assets cheaper → higher quantity demanded.
SUPPLY OF £
UK residents supply £ to: buy imports (need to sell £ to buy foreign currency); invest abroad; speculate on sterling falling. Supply curve upward-sloping: higher £ makes foreign goods/assets cheaper in £ terms → more £ supplied.
EQUILIBRIUM
Where D = S: the market-clearing exchange rate. In practice, forex market trades ~$7.5 trillion/day (BIS 2022) — UK makes up ~38% of global forex turnover (London is the world's largest forex market). Rate changes continuously — 24/7 market.
FACTORS SHIFTING DEMAND (↑£)
Rise in UK export demand; rise in UK interest rates (hot money flows in); higher UK asset prices attracting foreign investment; UK inflation FALLS relative to abroad (UK goods more competitive); stronger UK growth prospects; speculation on appreciation.
FACTORS SHIFTING SUPPLY (↑£ supply → depreciation)
Rise in UK import demand; fall in UK interest rates (hot money flows out); UK investors buying foreign assets; UK inflation RISES (UK goods less competitive, import demand rises); weaker growth/higher risk; speculation on depreciation.
Exchange Rate Systems

Fixed, Floating and Managed Float

FLOATING
Rate determined entirely by market forces. UK since 1971; US, EU. Advantages: automatic adjustment to trade imbalances; monetary policy independence; no reserves needed. Disadvantages: volatility → uncertainty for traders; speculative attacks; may not correct smoothly.
FIXED
Government sets the rate and maintains it via intervention (buying/selling reserves or adjusting interest rates). Gold standard (pre-1914). ERM (1990–92 for UK). Advantages: certainty for trade/investment; anti-inflationary discipline. Disadvantages: requires reserves; loses monetary policy; currency crises when rate unsustainable.
MANAGED FLOAT
Rate mainly market-determined but government intervenes to limit volatility or prevent "misalignment." Most common system in practice (China, India, Singapore, many EMs). China managed yuan below equilibrium to boost export competitiveness — US accused of currency manipulation. Balances flexibility with stability.
UK CASE STUDY: BLACK WEDNESDAY (SEPT 1992)
UK joined ERM in 1990 with £ pegged to DM. German reunification forced high German interest rates; UK recession required low rates — irreconcilable. Speculators (Soros: bet $10bn against £) attacked sterling. UK raised base rate from 10% → 12% → 15% in a single day to defend the peg — couldn't hold. UK forced out of ERM; sterling fell 15%. George Soros made $1bn profit. UK gained monetary policy independence and recovered strongly — suggests flexible rate better suited UK's different economic cycle from Germany.
Currency Movements

Effects of Sterling Depreciation

Potential Benefits of Depreciation

  • Exports cheaper in foreign currency → export volume rises → boost to AD
  • Imports more expensive → import substitution → domestic firms gain market share
  • Trade balance may improve (if Marshall-Lerner condition satisfied)
  • Inflation boosts competitiveness of fixed-contract exporters
  • Tourism: foreign visitors find UK cheaper → tourism revenue rises
  • Supports domestic employment in export and import-competing sectors

Potential Costs of Depreciation

  • Import prices rise → cost-push inflation (particularly oil/commodities priced in $)
  • Higher inflation → lower real wages → reduced consumer purchasing power
  • Firms dependent on imported inputs face higher costs
  • Foreign debt servicing costs rise (debt denominated in foreign currency)
  • J-curve: trade balance may worsen before it improves
  • Loss of confidence in currency → capital flight if depreciation is severe
Brexit example: Sterling fell ~15% after June 2016. Exports became more competitive; UK export volumes rose modestly. But: inflation rose from 0.5% to 3.1% by late 2017 (import price rise). PwC estimated UK households paid ~£400 more/year on imported goods. The net effect on trade was modest — structural barriers mattered more than the exchange rate.
Trade Balance Effects

Marshall-Lerner Condition & J-Curve

Marshall-Lerner Condition
Depreciation improves the trade balance ONLY IF the sum of PED for exports + PED for imports exceeds 1. If |PEDx| + |PEDm| > 1: depreciation improves trade balance. If < 1: depreciation worsens it.
WHY IT MATTERS
Depreciation makes exports cheaper and imports more expensive. Whether trade balance improves depends on whether volumes respond enough to outweigh the price change. If demand is inelastic (oil, essential imports), price falls are offset by volume changes — trade balance may not improve. UK imports are relatively price-inelastic in short run → Marshall-Lerner may be borderline.
THE J-CURVE EFFECT
Short run: existing import/export contracts are fixed → volumes don't change quickly, but prices do. Higher import prices immediately → trade balance worsens. Long run: as contracts expire and volumes adjust → trade balance improves. Path traces a "J" shape over time. Typical lag: 6–18 months before trade balance improves after depreciation.
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
Studies generally support Marshall-Lerner for UK (|PEDx|+|PEDm| ≈ 1.5 long-run, but <1 short-run). After 2016 depreciation: UK current account deficit did not significantly narrow — partly because UK exports are increasingly services (inelastic) not goods. Services trade less responsive to exchange rate changes than goods.
Appreciation

Effects of Sterling Appreciation

BENEFITS
Imports cheaper → lower cost-push inflation → higher real incomes; UK firms' imported inputs cost less → profit margins improve; foreign currency debt cheaper to service; UK investors can buy foreign assets more cheaply; consumers benefit from cheaper goods (clothing, electronics).
COSTS
Exports more expensive in foreign currency → export volumes fall → lower AD; import substitution reverses → domestic firms lose market share; tourism: UK more expensive for foreign visitors → tourism revenue falls; trade balance may worsen; employment in export sectors falls.
INTEREST RATE AND EXCHANGE RATE LINK
Hot money flows: higher UK interest rates → foreign investors move money into UK assets for better returns → demand for £ rises → £ appreciates. This is the key transmission mechanism of monetary policy on the exchange rate. Bank of England raising rates (2022–2023) partly supported sterling. Covered and uncovered interest parity: theoretically, exchange rate adjusts so that returns equalise across countries (after accounting for expected rate changes).
Long-Run Theory

Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)

PPP Theory
In the long run, exchange rates should equalise the purchasing power of currencies. If a basket of goods costs £100 in the UK and $130 in the US, the exchange rate should be £1 = $1.30. If it diverges, arbitrage will push it back toward this level.
BIG MAC INDEX
The Economist's informal PPP measure: compares price of a McDonald's Big Mac across countries. If a Big Mac costs £3.99 in UK and $5.69 in US, implied PPP rate = 5.69/3.99 = $1.43/£. If actual rate is $1.27/£, sterling is "undervalued" by ~11% relative to the dollar according to this measure.
LIMITATIONS OF PPP
Works poorly in short run — capital flows dominate; traded vs non-traded goods differ (haircuts can't be arbitraged); tariffs and transport costs prevent full equalisation; Balassa-Samuelson effect: richer countries have higher prices for non-traded services. PPP is a long-run anchor not a short-run predictor.
UNCOVERED INTEREST PARITY
UIP: returns on equivalent assets in different countries should be equal once expected exchange rate changes are factored in. High-interest-rate currencies should depreciate to equalise returns. Evidence: UIP holds poorly in short run (carry trade exploits interest rate differentials profitably) but better in long run.
Question 1 of 8
If the pound appreciates from £1 = $1.25 to £1 = $1.40, which of the following is the most direct consequence?
A
UK exports become cheaper for US buyers and UK imports become more expensive
B
UK exports become more expensive for US buyers and UK imports become cheaper for UK residents
C
UK exports and imports are unaffected because prices are set in domestic currency
D
UK exports rise because the economy is growing and producing more goods
Answer · Question 1
If the pound appreciates from £1 = $1.25 to £1 = $1.40, which of the following is the most direct consequence?
A
UK exports become cheaper for US buyers and UK imports become more expensive
B
UK exports become more expensive for US buyers and UK imports become cheaper for UK residents
C
UK exports and imports are unaffected because prices are set in domestic currency
D
UK exports rise because the economy is growing and producing more goods
Correct: B. When £ appreciates, each pound buys more dollars. A UK good priced at £100 now costs US buyers $140 instead of $125 — more expensive. A US good priced at $125 now costs UK buyers £89 instead of £100 — cheaper. So appreciation: makes exports less competitive (volume falls) and makes imports cheaper (volume rises). The opposite of depreciation.
Question 2 of 8
The Marshall-Lerner condition states that a depreciation will improve a country's trade balance only if:
A
The domestic inflation rate is below 2% at the time of the depreciation
B
The sum of the price elasticities of demand for exports and imports exceeds 1
C
The country runs a current account surplus before the depreciation occurs
D
Interest rates are raised simultaneously to prevent capital flight
Answer · Question 2
The Marshall-Lerner condition states that a depreciation will improve a country's trade balance only if:
A
The domestic inflation rate is below 2% at the time of the depreciation
B
The sum of the price elasticities of demand for exports and imports exceeds 1
C
The country runs a current account surplus before the depreciation occurs
D
Interest rates are raised simultaneously to prevent capital flight
Correct: B. The Marshall-Lerner condition: |PEDx| + |PEDm| > 1. Depreciation makes exports cheaper and imports dearer. Whether this improves the trade balance depends on how much volumes change. If demand is very inelastic (people keep buying the same quantities), price changes dominate and the trade balance may worsen. If demand is elastic, volume changes outweigh price changes and the balance improves. In the short run, elasticities tend to be low (contracts fixed) — hence the J-curve.
Question 3 of 8
The J-curve effect suggests that after a depreciation, the trade balance will:
A
Immediately and permanently improve as exports surge
B
Remain completely unchanged because exchange rates don't affect trade volumes
C
Initially worsen before eventually improving as trade volumes adjust to new prices
D
Worsen permanently because depreciation always signals economic weakness
Answer · Question 3
The J-curve effect suggests that after a depreciation, the trade balance will:
A
Immediately and permanently improve as exports surge
B
Remain completely unchanged because exchange rates don't affect trade volumes
C
Initially worsen before eventually improving as trade volumes adjust to new prices
D
Worsen permanently because depreciation always signals economic weakness
Correct: C. The J-curve: in the short run, existing contracts mean trade volumes don't change quickly — but import prices rise immediately (more expensive in domestic currency). So import bill rises before export volumes respond → trade balance worsens. Over 6–18 months, exporters gain new contracts at competitive prices, importers switch to domestic alternatives → volumes adjust → trade balance improves. The time path traces a J shape.
Question 4 of 8
Black Wednesday (September 1992) demonstrated that:
A
Fixed exchange rate systems always lead to economic growth by providing certainty
B
A fixed exchange rate can be unsustainable if it is inconsistent with domestic economic conditions and speculators can force a devaluation
C
UK interest rates must always be aligned with German rates to maintain financial stability
D
Currency speculation always benefits the country whose currency is being attacked
Answer · Question 4
Black Wednesday (September 1992) demonstrated that:
A
Fixed exchange rate systems always lead to economic growth by providing certainty
B
A fixed exchange rate can be unsustainable if it is inconsistent with domestic economic conditions and speculators can force a devaluation
C
UK interest rates must always be aligned with German rates to maintain financial stability
D
Currency speculation always benefits the country whose currency is being attacked
Correct: B. Black Wednesday showed the fundamental weakness of fixed exchange rate systems: if the fixed rate is incompatible with domestic needs (UK needed low rates for recession; ERM required high rates to match Germany), speculative pressure is irresistible. George Soros recognised the inconsistency and bet $10bn against sterling — the UK government raised rates from 10% to 15% in one day but couldn't hold. After exiting the ERM, sterling depreciated, monetary policy could focus on the UK cycle, and recovery was strong.
Question 5 of 8
Which of the following would MOST likely cause the pound to depreciate against the dollar?
A
The Bank of England raises interest rates above Federal Reserve rates
B
UK exports of financial services surge following a trade deal with the US
C
UK inflation rises significantly above US inflation, making UK goods less competitive
D
US investors increase their purchases of UK government gilts
Answer · Question 5
Which of the following would MOST likely cause the pound to depreciate against the dollar?
A
The Bank of England raises interest rates above Federal Reserve rates
B
UK exports of financial services surge following a trade deal with the US
C
UK inflation rises significantly above US inflation, making UK goods less competitive
D
US investors increase their purchases of UK government gilts
Correct: C. Higher UK inflation → UK goods become relatively more expensive → export demand falls (less demand for £) → import demand rises (more UK residents selling £ for foreign goods) → supply of £ increases → pound depreciates. A is wrong — higher UK rates attract hot money inflows → demand for £ rises → appreciation. B is wrong — more service exports → more demand for £ → appreciation. D is wrong — foreign investment in UK gilts → demand for £ → appreciation.
Question 6 of 8
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) suggests that in the long run:
A
Countries with higher interest rates will always have stronger exchange rates
B
Exchange rates adjust so that equivalent baskets of goods cost the same in different countries when measured in a common currency
C
Countries with current account surpluses will always have appreciating currencies
D
Exchange rates are primarily determined by political stability rather than economic fundamentals
Answer · Question 6
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) suggests that in the long run:
A
Countries with higher interest rates will always have stronger exchange rates
B
Exchange rates adjust so that equivalent baskets of goods cost the same in different countries when measured in a common currency
C
Countries with current account surpluses will always have appreciating currencies
D
Exchange rates are primarily determined by political stability rather than economic fundamentals
Correct: B. PPP: if a basket of goods costs £100 in UK and $130 in US, the exchange rate should converge toward £1 = $1.30 through arbitrage. If UK inflation is persistently higher than US, sterling should depreciate to maintain PPP. Works as a long-run anchor but poorly predicts short-run movements (dominated by capital flows and speculation). The Big Mac Index is The Economist's informal PPP measure.
Question 7 of 8
A managed float exchange rate system differs from a freely floating system in that:
A
The exchange rate is fixed permanently against a major currency like the dollar
B
The government intervenes periodically to smooth excessive volatility or prevent misalignment, while the market determines the general level
C
Only central banks can buy and sell the currency — private market participants are excluded
D
The exchange rate can only move within a fixed percentage band set by the WTO
Answer · Question 7
A managed float exchange rate system differs from a freely floating system in that:
A
The exchange rate is fixed permanently against a major currency like the dollar
B
The government intervenes periodically to smooth excessive volatility or prevent misalignment, while the market determines the general level
C
Only central banks can buy and sell the currency — private market participants are excluded
D
The exchange rate can only move within a fixed percentage band set by the WTO
Correct: B. A managed float (also called "dirty float") is the most common system in practice. The exchange rate primarily reflects supply and demand, but the central bank intervenes (buying/selling foreign reserves, or adjusting interest rates) to prevent disorderly markets or excessive misalignment. China operated this for decades, keeping the yuan artificially weak. Singapore's MAS manages its exchange rate band actively as its primary monetary policy tool.
Question 8 of 8
Following UK membership of the ERM (1990–1992), which policy conflict made the fixed exchange rate unsustainable?
A
UK inflation was too low relative to Germany's, making sterling undervalued in the ERM
B
The UK needed low interest rates to combat recession, but ERM membership required high rates to maintain the sterling-DM peg
C
UK trade deficits forced the Bank of England to devalue sterling voluntarily
D
Germany refused to allow sterling to depreciate because it threatened German export competitiveness
Answer · Question 8
Following UK membership of the ERM (1990–1992), which policy conflict made the fixed exchange rate unsustainable?
A
UK inflation was too low relative to Germany's, making sterling undervalued in the ERM
B
The UK needed low interest rates to combat recession, but ERM membership required high rates to maintain the sterling-DM peg
C
UK trade deficits forced the Bank of England to devalue sterling voluntarily
D
Germany refused to allow sterling to depreciate because it threatened German export competitiveness
Correct: B. The fundamental contradiction: UK was in deep recession (high unemployment, housing crash) and needed interest rate cuts. But German reunification pushed up German inflation → Bundesbank raised rates → to maintain the DM peg, UK also had to keep rates high (10%+). This was perverse — contractionary monetary policy during a UK recession. Speculators (Soros) recognised the government would eventually have to choose between its citizens' economic welfare and the peg. They bet on the peg breaking, and won. This is the core lesson: fixed exchange rates eliminate monetary policy flexibility.
🎓

Lesson Complete

You've covered exchange rate determination (supply and demand of sterling), fixed vs floating vs managed float systems, effects of appreciation and depreciation, the Marshall-Lerner condition, the J-curve, purchasing power parity, and the Black Wednesday case study.

← Economics Home All Lessons